48 hour sickness exclusion - too long?
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Stoke-On-Trent
    Posts
    506
    Registered Childminder since
    Dec 00
    Latest Inspection Grade
    good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 48 hour sickness exclusion - too long?

    I printed off the official sickness exclusion list to give to parents. However our local primary school only states 24 hours exclusion for sickness and diarrhoea whereas the childminding one is 48 hours. Is there a medical reason to have 48 hours exclusion? It does seem quite a long time to be off, especially if a child has been fine for at least 24 hours. It also makes it difficult if the schools policy is different to mine. Any advice is most appreciated thank you.
    Julie X X

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,868
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 10
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by julie w View Post
    I printed off the official sickness exclusion list to give to parents. However our local primary school only states 24 hours exclusion for sickness and diarrhoea whereas the childminding one is 48 hours. Is there a medical reason to have 48 hours exclusion? It does seem quite a long time to be off, especially if a child has been fine for at least 24 hours. It also makes it difficult if the schools policy is different to mine. Any advice is most appreciated thank you.
    Health Protection Agency have this handy poster for us and schools to follow- I suggest you give a copy to the school ASAP and request a response from them. They are putting the children, including yours, and the staff at risk if they are not following the 48 hour rules:


    www.hpa.org.uk/webc/hpawebfile/hpaweb_c/1194947358374


    ETA: now see HPA is now Public Health England. I can not find an updated document on their website, anyone got any written evidence quoting the 48hr rule?
    I am sure I have read it on NHS website too- OP could look there too.
    Last edited by moggy; 05-03-2014 at 02:13 PM.

  3. Likes rickysmiths, Koala liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,868
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 10
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here it is:

    Absence from school - Live Well - NHS Choices

    again, 48hr rule.

    Also, we are food handlers so covered by Food Standards Agency, link to document at the bottom of this page:

    Food Standards Agency - Hygiene reminder following NI E.coli outbreak

    So, basically, it IS 48hrs from last symptoms. School need to be told ASAP.

  5. Likes Koala liked this post
  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    in the never never land fighting off fae
    Posts
    7,026
    Registered Childminder since
    july05
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default

    Schools are ignoring the 48hour rule because they get marked down by ofsted for low attendances

    48 hours is there to stop it spreading back and forth between children/adults.
    When someone tells you nothing is impossible, tell them to go slam a revolving door

  7. Likes rickysmiths, Koala, little chickee liked this post
  8. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Somewhere West of Watford!!!
    Posts
    9,085
    Registered Childminder since
    Aug 94
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Not all school are I have an after school one at the moment and he was sick yesterday and mum said he was not at school(no pick up to day or tomorrow) and she would let me know if he was back at school by Friday.

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    at my computer, of course
    Posts
    4,986
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 11
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FussyElmo View Post
    Schools are ignoring the 48hour rule because they get marked down by ofsted for low attendances

    48 hours is there to stop it spreading back and forth between children/adults.
    This is where 'performance-driven' policies have got us. School are more worried about missing attendance targets than they are by the idea of a few dead children.

  10. Likes Koala liked this post
  11. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    9,335
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was surprised when I phoned our senior school last year to say my son wouldn't be in as he'd been sick that morning. I said I knew it was 48 hours before he could be back, but was told that didn't count any more and to send him back as soon as possible

    In a way I'm glad they don't stick to the 48 hour rule. My children all suffer from migraine, which make them sick. But they're sick once at the very end, then they're OK (just the same as I was at that age). I really wouldn't want to keep them off for 48 hours every time they had a migraine as they'd be missing too much school.

    But I do know when it's a migraine making them ill and when it's something else. For anything else I keep them off, no matter what school says.

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,151
    Registered Childminder since
    Mar 04
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'm not happy that the 48hr rule isn't followed at school and I agree it's to meet attendance performance.

    My son was sent home from school sick (his stomach contents out of his mouth) - day one, I kept him home the next day and the school rang to ask why he wasn't in, yes they knew he was sick the previous day however they said if he felt better he could come in to school. And spread his bugs, puke and lurgy to all on sundry because they don't care about the welfare of the children or adults in the school just ticks on registers - ok they didn't say that but it's how I interpreted their phone call. UNBELEIVABLE!!

  13. Likes bunyip liked this post
  14. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    3,857
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 97
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    It's 48 hours at the local primary, the senior school when I range to say he had been sick this morning, she said what time as if before 8.30 he could go in!
    I went nuts, my middle child has a low immune system and they were putting him at risk, needless to say they changed it to 48 hours after I contacted lea.

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    4,247
    Registered Childminder since
    may 05
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I thought that sickness was an authorised absence and didn't count against the school.

  16. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,573
    Registered Childminder since
    July 10
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hectors house View Post
    I thought that sickness was an authorised absence and didn't count against the school.
    unfortunately not, it still goes against the school.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Quick Links and Advertisements

Important Information Links
Some Useful Quick Links
Advertisements

 

You can also find us on:
48 hour sickness exclusion - too long? 48 hour sickness exclusion - too long? 48 hour sickness exclusion - too long?

We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. They are small text files placed in your browser to track usage of our site but they don’t tell us who you are.
By continuing to use this site you are consenting to cookies being placed on your computer. Find out more here: Cookies in Use

Childminding Help and the Childminding Forum are part of Childcare.co.uk