Originally Posted by
Rick
I suppose the crux of the matter is this:
1. The EYFS isn't clear on some matters. This is the main issue....too much interpretation allowed on some matters by cm's and possible downgrading if an inspector does not agree with a cm's decision.
2. On this specific matter, there is nothing in the EYFS which allows you to exceed numbers where there are no exceptional circumstances. It states a max of 3 under 5's. It does not state you can exceed this figure with a risk assessment. Should the EYFS be amended to state every permutation allowed? Probably not as it would make it even more complicated. Would a fact sheet, similar to the number and ages of children which has been withdrawn, help matters? Definitely.
3. Should a 15 minute overlap be allowed? Common sense says yes but it is contrary to the 3 under 5's ratio so is a risk even if risk assessed appropriately. Yes cm's can increase to 4 for continuity of care, so we can presume most would cope with 4 for 15 minutes when it is new business, so why not a 15 minute overlap? The reason continuity of care is permissible: it prevents settled children having to leave the setting. If you allow 15 minutes, where do you draw the line?