Heaven Scent
06-11-2009, 12:38 AM
A friend of mine who has been minding for 25 years applied for the following variation -
She has had a 3 yr old girl T for about 2 years now and she was supposed to have left at half term.
Friend took on a little boy to start the week after next to replace her.
Mum got back to her to say that she now needs her until Jan so minder has managed to swop one of her days and has but not the other so applied for a variation for almost 6 weeks (6 days in all) - and that is only if another child Th's dad who has been out of work for a while now manages to hold onto a temp job hes had for the past 6 or so weeks. She looked after Th's 11 year old brother D since shortly after he was born and took Th on when he was about 9mths old - he will be 2 in Jan.
Anyway little girl T never met her biological dad, then knew P as her Dad but mum and him have parted and now she is with another bloke who has been out of work until the last week or so but now is working away - this is taking it toll on poor T who thinks that he has left them like the man P who she calls her daddy.
Anyhow my friend applied for a variation to keep poor T on until Christmas as well as taking on the new boy as planned - bearing in mind that TH may leave at any time. in Addition to these she has J who has recently increased his days.
Anyway, she had a call from the office of the mignty "O" today to say they couldn't grant the variation as it would be illegal. She felt that this was so unjust and had a bit of a rant at the bearer of the bad news and went over the situation again so he got someone else to speak to her - this time a lady who said exactly the same thing and when she asked the woman who she suggested she give up and what to say she said they weren't asking her to choose or to give any of them up but they couldn't grant the variation as it would be illegal - then another man came on the phone and again he said the same thing. They say its not continuity of care??? - I would have thought it was. Then they told her she could appeal - what would be the point of that when 3 people have already said it would be illegal.
Is this normal - what do others think!!! On what grounds have others been granted variations?
She has had a 3 yr old girl T for about 2 years now and she was supposed to have left at half term.
Friend took on a little boy to start the week after next to replace her.
Mum got back to her to say that she now needs her until Jan so minder has managed to swop one of her days and has but not the other so applied for a variation for almost 6 weeks (6 days in all) - and that is only if another child Th's dad who has been out of work for a while now manages to hold onto a temp job hes had for the past 6 or so weeks. She looked after Th's 11 year old brother D since shortly after he was born and took Th on when he was about 9mths old - he will be 2 in Jan.
Anyway little girl T never met her biological dad, then knew P as her Dad but mum and him have parted and now she is with another bloke who has been out of work until the last week or so but now is working away - this is taking it toll on poor T who thinks that he has left them like the man P who she calls her daddy.
Anyhow my friend applied for a variation to keep poor T on until Christmas as well as taking on the new boy as planned - bearing in mind that TH may leave at any time. in Addition to these she has J who has recently increased his days.
Anyway, she had a call from the office of the mignty "O" today to say they couldn't grant the variation as it would be illegal. She felt that this was so unjust and had a bit of a rant at the bearer of the bad news and went over the situation again so he got someone else to speak to her - this time a lady who said exactly the same thing and when she asked the woman who she suggested she give up and what to say she said they weren't asking her to choose or to give any of them up but they couldn't grant the variation as it would be illegal - then another man came on the phone and again he said the same thing. They say its not continuity of care??? - I would have thought it was. Then they told her she could appeal - what would be the point of that when 3 people have already said it would be illegal.
Is this normal - what do others think!!! On what grounds have others been granted variations?