omg look at this!!!
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    maidstone, kent
    Posts
    1,452
    Registered Childminder since
    May 08
    Latest Inspection Grade
    satisfactory
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default omg look at this!!!

    Childminder guilty of killing boy

    Last Updated: Thursday, 31 January 2008, 21:30 GMT
    - Search: Agnes Wong childminder


    Childminder Agnes Wong, who was convicted of killing a toddlerA childminder has been found guilty of killing a toddler in her care by inflicting a serious head injury.

    Agnes Wong, 28, was convicted at Manchester Crown Court of the manslaughter of 17-month-old Hugo Wang. Hugo also suffered bite marks, bruising and burns caused by a hairdryer. He was taken to Manchester Royal Infirmary on January 25 last year, when hospital staff became concerned by his injuries.

    Wong, her boyfriend Jian Jiu, and two others in their flat at Frank Cowin Court, Fitzwilliam Street, Salford, were arrested on suspicion of assault. Hugo was transferred to Pendlebury Children's Hospital in Salford where he underwent emergency surgery to reduce the pressure on his brain caused by internal bleeding.

    However, it became clear that Hugo couldn't survive, and his life support machines were switched off just before 5pm the following day.


    A post mortem examination showed the cause of death to be a traumatic head injury, likely to have been inflicted some time on the day before he died. Hugo's brain had shifted in his skull, and there was bleeding between his skull and his brain.

    Wong was paid by Hugo's mother to look after her son all the time.

    The police investigation found that Hugo's burn marks were from the hot grille of a hairdryer, and the marks on his legs had been caused by Wong hitting him with a ruler when he would not stop crying. Wong and her boyfriend were re-arrested on suspicion of Hugo's murder an hour after he died.

    Police interviewed Jian Jiu's nine-year-old son, who lived with the couple, as a witness to the crime. He told officers that he was frightened of Wong. The boy said that on January 25 he and his father had gone to a neighbouring flat in Frank Cowin Court to wash, as their boiler had broken. Wong and Hugo were left in their flat.

    Wong appeared saying that something was wrong with Hugo and she was taking him to hospital. Wong was charged with Hugo's murder on January 29 last year, which she denied.

    Jian Jiu was charged with causing or allowing the death of a child by an unlawful act. During the course of the two-week trial this charge was dropped. The two others who were arrested were released without charge.

    what gose through ppls minds when they do this????

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dreaming of gorgeous George
    Posts
    4,860
    Registered Childminder since
    Sept 00
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    oh isn't that awful poor little boy and his poor parent's too

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    uk, england
    Posts
    604
    Registered Childminder since
    2008
    Latest Inspection Grade
    good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    oh my
    Im just a littlestar *

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    778
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Doesnt say if she was registered???

    Sx

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    3,738
    Registered Childminder since
    May 01
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Schnakes View Post
    Doesnt say if she was registered???

    Sx
    I wondered about this as well and could not find that info on any news sites.
    Apparently the child was looked after in Manchester, the parents worked in Southport and the mother only saw child once a week! Sounds odd to me. I think I also read the parents were illegal immigrants.

    Annie x

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    31,017
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    That is so horrible, poor little boy

    It doesn't sound to me as though this woman was a registered childminder.

    I thnik the word childminder has been used a bit loosely by the press here - more like she was just looking after him.

    That's how we all get a bad name - maybe ncma will check it out and try to refute it if she was not registered

    Miffy xx

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    With the sexy Enrique
    Posts
    28,101
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    That is horrible how sad

    Angel xx

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    37,504
    Registered Childminder since
    1994
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    21

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,190
    Registered Childminder since
    May 200
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Grade 5
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Its absolutely horrific. Makes me so mad. Poor little thing

    Emler x

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    With the fairies
    Posts
    2,456
    Registered Childminder since
    Dec 07
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    I read about it on Daily Mail website.

    She was NOT a registered childminder.

    It is a shame the other reports havent pointed this fact out!

    Poor boy though, it really sounds like he suffered a lot.

  11. #11
    Pipsqueak Guest

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    This sort of thing brings tears to my eyes - the poor baby. May the woman rot in hell.




    That was the first thing that popped into my head - was she reg'd?
    This is the sort of thing that the NCMA need to be jumping on and stopping - allowing the press to call her a childminder when she clearly wasn't.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    head in clouds
    Posts
    2,548
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by vik3000 View Post
    This sort of thing brings tears to my eyes - the poor baby. May the woman rot in hell.




    That was the first thing that popped into my head - was she reg'd?
    This is the sort of thing that the NCMA need to be jumping on and stopping - allowing the press to call her a childminder when she clearly wasn't.
    Totally agree that was my first thought too.

    By calling her a childminder gives the rest of us a bad name!!!
    Lou xx

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Yawksha, eee by gum, tis wer Im frum
    Posts
    376
    Registered Childminder since
    October
    Latest Inspection Grade
    none yet!
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    this is horrible! I am speechless at how this woman dare do this to such an innocent little boy who depended on her to LOOK AFTER him.

    My prayers and thoughts go out to his family r.i.p x x


    and I think ncma should def get onto the papers for a retraction for calling this lady a " childminder" as she clearly isnt!!
    Love GG x x

  14. #14
    Pipsqueak Guest

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    I have just emailed NCMA (as I feel that strongly about this) about them redressing the statement that this woman was a "childminder" and asking them what they (NCMA) do to educate the press and public more about what constitutes a childminder - registration, qualifications and the level of dedication and professionalism nowadays.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    in the meadow dreaming of Edward ...
    Posts
    5,012
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    omg how awful the poor little soul x

    I think NCMA should have done a press release to say she was not a registered childminder with Ofsted and therefore was not following strict guidelines and meeting national standards that are in place....

    thought are with the child x
    Love Mrs Edward Cullen x

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    somerset
    Posts
    3,518
    Registered Childminder since
    Dec 200
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Horiffic!

    How sad and wrong
    x
    Big banana hugs from me!

    xxx

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    here, there and everywhere
    Posts
    5,463
    Registered Childminder since
    Feb 04
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good Apr 15
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by vik3000 View Post
    I have just emailed NCMA (as I feel that strongly about this) about them redressing the statement that this woman was a "childminder" and asking them what they (NCMA) do to educate the press and public more about what constitutes a childminder - registration, qualifications and the level of dedication and professionalism nowadays.
    did you do one? They are normal good at this.


    SUch a shame for the poor boy, regardless of everything he shouldn't off been treated in this way

  18. #18
    Pipsqueak Guest

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Quick Update

    This is on the NCMA website...



    NCMA clarifies inaccurate use of the term "childminder".


    As you may have seen, some newspapers are today (1 February 2008) carrying a story about an unregistered childcarer who was found guilty of manslaughter yesterday. Unfortunately whilst some of the media have outlined that this person was an unregistered carer, some have used the term childminder. NCMA has written to the BBC, as well as other media outlets, to highlight the inaccuracy and request that they use the correct terminology in future.


    The letter to the BBC is below.

    Dear BBC News,

    The headline to your story which ran on BBC online (31 January 2008) - "Childminder guilty of killing boy" is not only factually inaccurate but has the potential to cause great anxiety among parents who use registered childminders to support the care and education of their children.

    The misleading headline and subsequent story referred to Agnes Wong as a 'childminder' responsible for the tragic death of Hugo Wang. This is factually incorrect. Registered childminders are inspected by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) in England and the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) in Wales, and meet stringent national standards and undergo rigorous checks as to their suitability to care for children. They number some 70,000, providing over 300,000 places to parents across England and Wales and, like nurseries and pre-schools provide high-quality early learning and development opportunities for children.

    Agnes Wong was not a childminder and instead was operating privately with no regulation or inspection. This unregistered, unregulated childcare bears no relation to childminding. I appreciate this may sound like semantics, but this casual use of 'childminder' leads to a great deal of concern and anger amongst registered childminders and can undermine the confidence of the parents who use their services.

    I would be grateful for an explanation as to how this inappropriate terminology was used in such a news piece and would urge you to ensure correct use of the terminology in your future reporting.

    Yours sincerely

    Andrew Fletcher

    Director of Communications

    National Childminding Association

  19. #19
    Pipsqueak Guest

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Yay NCMA!!!!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    6,323
    Registered Childminder since
    Apr 98
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: omg look at this!!!

    Thanks Vik

    At least they have responded!!!!

    It does annoy me when the newspapers just rant and rave and say childminder when in fact these people aren't
    Dee
    Independent Cambridge Diet Counsellor



    Life may not be the party we hoped for.......but while we're here we should dance!

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Quick Links and Advertisements

Important Information Links
Some Useful Quick Links
Advertisements

 

You can also find us on:
omg look at this!!! omg look at this!!! omg look at this!!!

We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. They are small text files placed in your browser to track usage of our site but they don’t tell us who you are.
By continuing to use this site you are consenting to cookies being placed on your computer. Find out more here: Cookies in Use

Childminding Help and the Childminding Forum are part of Childcare.co.uk