OFSTED: Inspection report writing guidance (updated)
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  11
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Simona Guest

    Default OFSTED: Inspection report writing guidance (updated)

    Inspection reports writing guidance for EY inspectors has been updated 2 Nov 2015

    keep it safe and make sure you check your reports when they arrive!

    Funding review on 30 hours to be published on 25 November | Nursery World

  2. Likes FloraDora liked this post
  3. #2
    Simona Guest

    Default

    So very sorry everyone I posted the wrong link to the new guidance for inspection reports

    here is the link

    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...idance#history

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    In the middle
    Posts
    1,049
    Registered Childminder since
    Feb 06
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks. Very useful. I've printed it and will keep it for reference.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,361
    Registered Childminder since
    oct 02
    Latest Inspection Grade
    outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Thanks xxx

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,251
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Do we know what the update is from the previous doc?

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    663
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 08
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks, Simona.

    Really useful.

    I got to the end of only the first page, and chuckled at the missing punctuation mark (second set of bullet points; fourth bullet). Wonder if they've spotted it yet?

    Having a look through the rest for any others.

    Yep - found another error on page 3 - a spelling mistake: third bullet towards bottom of the page should read "contradicts". So much for 'accuracy'.



    LK
    Last edited by lollipop kid; 13-11-2015 at 12:38 PM.

  8. Likes BallyH, rickysmiths liked this post
  9. #7
    Simona Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipop kid View Post
    Thanks, Simona.

    Really useful.

    I got to the end of only the first page, and chuckled at the missing punctuation mark (second set of bullet points; fourth bullet). Wonder if they've spotted it yet?

    Having a look through the rest for any others.

    Yep - found another error on page 3 - a spelling mistake: third bullet towards bottom of the page should read "contradicts". So much for 'accuracy'.



    LK
    Amazing the number of times the word 'and' is preceded by a comma...that is grammatically incorrect surely?...or so I was taught by my English teacher

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    663
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 08
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simona View Post
    Amazing the number of times the word 'and' is preceded by a comma...that is grammatically incorrect surely?...or so I was taught by my English teacher
    No, that is actually correct/acceptable. It's known as an "Oxford comma".

    I'm sorely tempted to email them and tell them about the other two errors, though, as surely these make the whole document 'not fit for publication'.



    What do you think?

    LK

  11. Likes rickysmiths liked this post
  12. #9
    Simona Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipop kid View Post
    No, that is actually correct/acceptable. It's known as an "Oxford comma".

    I'm sorely tempted to email them and tell them about the other two errors, though, as surely these make the whole document 'not fit for publication'.



    What do you think?

    LK
    Judging by the bullet point on page 3...below the one you mention as having an 's' missing from contradicts...then yes!

    'proof reading' before publications should be recommended!!

  13. Likes lollipop kid, loocyloo, rickysmiths liked this post
  14. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    663
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 08
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simona View Post
    Judging by the bullet point on page 3...below the one you mention as having an 's' missing from contradicts...then yes!

    'proof reading' before publications should be recommended!!
    I know - they really ought to have a word with their proof-reader.

    Finally, if it has just been updated, then why is the date still reading "January 2015"? Surely it should be dated "November 2015" or at least have a mention of "Updated November 2015".



    LK

  15. Likes rickysmiths liked this post
  16. #11
    Simona Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipop kid View Post
    I know - they really ought to have a word with their proof-reader.

    Finally, if it has just been updated, then why is the date still reading "January 2015"? Surely it should be dated "November 2015" or at least have a mention of "Updated November 2015".



    LK
    I have just tweeted to Ofsted why the date on the doc says Jan 2015 when it has been updated November?
    If I get a reply I will share...if I disappear I will be in the dungeons!

    By the way on the website page it actually says 2014...the mind boggles!

  17. Likes loocyloo liked this post
  18. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    663
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 08
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simona View Post
    I have just tweeted to Ofsted why the date on the doc says Jan 2015 when it has been updated November?
    If I get a reply I will share...if I disappear I will be in the dungeons!

    By the way on the website page it actually says 2014...the mind boggles!
    I'll see you in the dungeons, then, as I've just emailed them the corrections.



    LK

  19. Likes rickysmiths liked this post
  20. #13
    Simona Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipop kid View Post
    I'll see you in the dungeons, then, as I've just emailed them the corrections.



    LK
    Wow! Will have plenty of time to dissect their publications then!

    On another matter I was involved in a discussion about funding and tweeted to the DfE that LAs pay us months in arrears...or even a term in arrears...that may result in solitary confinement!

  21. Likes lollipop kid liked this post
 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Quick Links and Advertisements

Important Information Links
Some Useful Quick Links
Advertisements

 

You can also find us on:
OFSTED: Inspection report writing guidance (updated) OFSTED: Inspection report writing guidance (updated) OFSTED: Inspection report writing guidance (updated)

We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. They are small text files placed in your browser to track usage of our site but they don’t tell us who you are.
By continuing to use this site you are consenting to cookies being placed on your computer. Find out more here: Cookies in Use

Childminding Help and the Childminding Forum are part of Childcare.co.uk