Free childcare offer could force paying parents to give up work
Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  9
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Simona Guest

    Default Free childcare offer could force paying parents to give up work


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    37,504
    Registered Childminder since
    1994
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    21

    Default

    What a stupid situation Children from disadvantaged families will be encouraged into childcare - at the expense of children from working families... and since it's only for 15 hours a week it's not exactly going to make a huge difference to workforce availability for the disadvantaged families now is it

    Good to see they have thought it through so carefully

  3. Likes The Juggler, loocyloo, Ripeberry, cbj1609 liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    683
    Registered Childminder since
    Jan 13
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Just when you think they can't make any more of a mess of things! It would be funny if it wasn't messing up people's lives!!

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    282
    Registered Childminder since
    Oct 09
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Maybe the Monster raving loony party need to be in power??
    Is the funding for disadvantaged 2 yr olds available to all , regardless of whether parents actually use it to get into work? as the unemployment rate will go up with this happening, surely?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    12,122
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 04
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    it is actually shocking that a nursery should be giving notice to full time children in order to accept the funded places - where is the ethos in that. as someone has said - where are those parents going to end up when they lose their jobs - more parents on benefits
    if you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always got

  7. #6
    Simona Guest

    Default

    Once again LAs seem to be doing their own thing and pushing local policies...no way would I get rid of full time kids just because some LA needs a space for a 2 year old for many reasons

    First many LA have ignored cms setting for years and decided we were not of value to look after any funded children let alone 'disadvantaged' ones unless we bent to their rules
    When I run my own preschool 12 years ago Social Services used to call me regularly to offer spaces for poorer families...no discrimination there just a recognition that my setting was good and I was able to help these kids

    second... a lot of silly propaganda is now out there claiming there is a drop in childcare spaces...nonsense when thousands of cms have spaces but are being blocked by silly LA's restrictions

    third...it is in my view immoral to now concentrate on this scheme in this way...2 year olds are being pushed as the flagship for this govt and everything else is being forgotten and I detest the way these children are 'labelled' disadvantaged and in a way put on the market to be hoovered up by settings now willing to jump through so many hoops to accommodate them...

    well the funding is reasonable for them (not sure why I call it that) but then drops to unacceptable levels when they are 3.

    This is all a game and lets not forget the 2 year old scheme was actuallu introduced by the Labour party but Truss will be happy to claim it her own...except that without cms she will have too many spaces to fill despite the fact she is recruiting an army of new comers



    Off to the 2 year old funding conference now and I am sure some and I say 'some' in the panel will be moaning again about the cost of childcare...I am in no mood to take any of that and to top it all my LA is attending...after months of wasted efforts to try and engage with them they will be there listening to the DfE telling them again that cms should be included in the funding....


    If any 'big' news comes out I will post directly in the forum
    Last edited by Simona; 05-06-2013 at 07:08 AM.

  8. Likes loocyloo, Ripeberry liked this post
  9. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    688
    Registered Childminder since
    sept 10
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Why do you think they want to up ratios???

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    In a happy place
    Posts
    420
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 10
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    this has already started in our area and because of the huge numbers of disadvantaged 2 year olds, nurseries in this area cant cope so childminders are getting asked more and more to take on the excess....but I have found that the parents who take up the free places arent actually wanting to go back to work....most of them are sitting in the local pubs for the 15 hours a week!!!

  11. Likes Ripeberry liked this post
  12. #9
    Simona Guest

    Default

    The ratios for cms have 'already' been increased via the EYFS as many cms are already looking after more that 3 children under 5

    For day care and preschools ...the option of having 1:13 is also on the EYFS but not taken up..they must have good reasons for not doing so
    and last because Truss has fixed her ideas on following France et al rather than focus on reducing costs by cutting red tape she is actually increasing it and increasing our costs...she would gain 'some' tiny bit of respect by listening and compromising instead of her senseless stand

  13. #10
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    70
    Registered Childminder since
    prereg
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I had a LA network meeting lastnight. My DO said the nurseries in my area are full and the childminders I know and myself are full. This news is abit worrying. Soon parents will not have alot of choices. Xx

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    not where I should be...
    Posts
    10,845
    Registered Childminder since
    Aug 94
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    It is sad that they are doing this but on the plus side childminders will have a good chance of filling full time places
    Debbie

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Surrounded by pesky Smurfs
    Posts
    4,551
    Registered Childminder since
    Ex CM
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Non childminder member
    01/01/09
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by catlyn View Post
    this has already started in our area and because of the huge numbers of disadvantaged 2 year olds, nurseries in this area cant cope so childminders are getting asked more and more to take on the excess....but I have found that the parents who take up the free places arent actually wanting to go back to work....most of them are sitting in the local pubs for the 15 hours a week!!!
    Too right! Employers won't give them a job in the first place and they won't take one on as ALL new jobs need you to work a weekend. Some EVERY weekend!
    Need a laugh? Visit my website: www.unclegargy.deviantART.com

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    9,334
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ripeberry View Post
    Too right! Employers won't give them a job in the first place and they won't take one on as ALL new jobs need you to work a weekend. Some EVERY weekend!
    But the idea of funded places isn't so that parents can go to work. It's an attempt to raise the development standards of 'disadvantaged' 2 year olds, who are statistically considered to be behind their more affluent peers. The government believes that putting these children into childcare at the age of 2 will improve their learning outcomes. It's nothing to do with getting parents back to work.

  17. Likes karensmart4 liked this post
  18. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    757
    Registered Childminder since
    Sept 03
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mouse View Post
    But the idea of funded places isn't so that parents can go to work. It's an attempt to raise the development standards of 'disadvantaged' 2 year olds, who are statistically considered to be behind their more affluent peers. The government believes that putting these children into childcare at the age of 2 will improve their learning outcomes. It's nothing to do with getting parents back to work.
    This is correct. This is an opportunity to make a difference to these children's lives, hopefully in the long term. 15 hours in a high quality childcare setting can make a huge difference in "closing the gap" between the children from "less advantaged" backgrounds (that's the phrase used here) and the children from more affluent backgrounds as has been proved in the pilot project. I was very sceptical in the beginning about how much difference can be made in just 10 hours (as it was then) and was surprised at the difference it made both to the children and some of their families. If some of the parents go out and get jobs when they wouldn't have done otherwise, well that's a bonus.

  19. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    9,334
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The other problem is that if the parents do go out to work while the children are receiving their funded hours, it could push family income to a level where the children no longer qualify for funding! It could actually trap some parents - don't work & get funded sessions or work & lose them!

  20. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    12,122
    Registered Childminder since
    Nov 04
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Good
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mouse View Post
    The other problem is that if the parents do go out to work while the children are receiving their funded hours, it could push family income to a level where the children no longer qualify for funding! It could actually trap some parents - don't work & get funded sessions or work & lose them!
    it won't Mouse. Under the new phase of the project, once a child has the 2 year funding, the family keep it whether or not parents end up in work/off benefits. I found this out a few weeks back.
    if you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always got

  21. Likes Mouse liked this post
  22. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    By the sea
    Posts
    9,334
    Latest Inspection Grade
    Outstanding
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Juggler View Post
    it won't Mouse. Under the new phase of the project, once a child has the 2 year funding, the family keep it whether or not parents end up in work/off benefits. I found this out a few weeks back.
    Thanks Juggler, that's good to know

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Quick Links and Advertisements

Important Information Links
Some Useful Quick Links
Advertisements

 

You can also find us on:
Free childcare offer could force paying parents to give up work Free childcare offer could force paying parents to give up work Free childcare offer could force paying parents to give up work

We use cookies to make this site as useful as possible. They are small text files placed in your browser to track usage of our site but they don’t tell us who you are.
By continuing to use this site you are consenting to cookies being placed on your computer. Find out more here: Cookies in Use

Childminding Help and the Childminding Forum are part of Childcare.co.uk